• Part 2 Of The Medical Research Gone Wrong

    By -


    Imagine a 1950s horror movie monster-a creeping, gelatinous, gluey tangle of gunk that strangles everything around it. That's what amyloid plaques are like when they form in body tissues. These gooey protein clumps are associated with many chronic and debilitating disorders, including type 2 diabetes and neurodegenerative diseases like Parkinson's and Huntington's.

    Amyloid plaques were a mystery for many years. The German physician Alois Alzheimer first noticed them in the early 1900s in the brain of a deceased patient who had experienced a peculiar form of memory loss and mood swings-symptoms of the disease that now bears his name. A few decades ago, scientists determined the basic structure of the plaques. Since then, researchers, many funded by the National Institutes of Health, have made enormous strides in understanding how these structures play roles in disease.

    One of the saddest lessons of history is this: If we’ve been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We’re no longer interested in finding out the truth. The bamboozle has captured us. It’s simply too painful to acknowledge, even to ourselves, that we’ve been taken. Once you give a charlatan power over you, you almost never get it back. — Carl Sagan (1934 – 1996)

    The above quotes are from influential men of rather recent times, not some apocalyptical soothsayers who were out to make names for themselves. Those quotes place witness to the ability of some to foresee the path humankind was traveling down. Very few, except the revered real charlatans of science, were permitted to perpetuate what’s been termed eugenics using whatever way you want to define the term. Remodeling human DNA or, currently, what’s termed “slow kill” eugenics, which employ technologies of …

    Many parents don’t realize that when they purchase vaccines for their babies, the cost is taxed and the money goes into a special fund to compensate them if and when those vaccines seriously injure or kill their babies. As of May 2013, $2.5 billion was granted for thousands of injuries and deaths caused by vaccines. Numerous cases are still pending.

    Readers will recall that in Part 1 of “Medical Research Gone Wrong,” Catherine interviewed the authors of the book Against Their Will. Within the Introduction of that exceptional book, the authors say this about eugenics:

    The eugenic fervor in the United States would gradually wane during the 1920s and dissipate further during the Great Depression while speeding up and taking a more malevolent form in Nazi Germany. At the same time, there were still orphanages and institutions for the disabled, and the treatment given to inmates there still showed the influence of eugenics. Although no longer a philosophical force, the eugenics movement had done its job: thousands of Americans had been dehumanized and thoroughly devalued.

    What Catherine wishes to point out is the undeniable fact that a surreptitious form of eugenics still is being carried out. Listen carefully to Mr. Bill Gates describing the mathematical equation to effectuate population control, something those who, should be exposing, quite frankly, are not.

    If the early research in eugenics, as exposed in Against Their Will, apparently is practiced in unassuming daily medical procedures like vaccinations, then nothing much has changed.

    There’s a euphemism that says, “Past is prologue,” meaning: What transpired in the past actually can be an introductory event, act, or even period in time relative to current or future happenings.

    To emphasize apparent misinformation or even possible ‘pseudo-science’ that promoted advertising products, we need to look back to product advertisements and wonder what were they thinking when advertising and selling tape worms as weight reduction; cocaine toothache drops; cigarettes that ‘guarded against throat-scratch’; heroin in a bottle; and Catherine’s all-time favorite, “More Doctors smoke Camels than any other cigarette.”How can anyone forget the hubris of the medical professions foisting margarine, a non-healthful trans fat, as preventing or managing heart disease! Of course, there were Throat Pastilles made with cocaine, and various other corporate products in the past, like vaccines today, that were/are hyped to the point of total belief and acceptance regardless of the harm they cause.

    The only problem now is that those agencies that brought reforms into being now promulgate pseudo-science, especially when it comes to Big Pharma’s vaccines and vaccination studies. We have to look no further than the fact that there is a total blackout within the U.S. media, news reporting, and as much as they can command on the Internet to keeping healthcare consumers totally ingnorant as to the valid science regarding neurotoxins and other toxic ingredients in vaccines and the harms vaccines cause.

    Ironically, those very same government agencies are mandating that poisonous, well-advertised-pharmaceutical products be injected into newborn infants, babies, toddlers, teens, adults, and senior citizens. Oh, let’s not forget our pets, companion animals, and those animals that are raised as food.

    Maybe something is totally amiss – maybe by design? – when there’s such zeal in mandating everyone/thing be polluted by one particular product, which independent scientific studies disprove much of its hyped effectiveness. In law, when entities collaborate to do nefarious things it’s considered a conspiracy. Catherine contends its medical research gone wrong.

    A detailed investigation into what went wrong recommended many changes to the way first-in-man trials are carried out. Those recommendations have now been put in place. What happened to the six men in the trial was widely reported in the media. It was shocking but highly unusual. Nothing of the same scale has been reported before or since in the UK.  All first-in-man studies, particularly those that use new types of treatment with possibly unpredictable side effects, are now carried out much more cautiously. With research carried out in the NHS, researchers are likely to have a good idea of possible benefits and side effects of treatment. Researchers have to make the medical background clear and describe details of any new treatments or other interventions being carried out.

    Please Read this Article at



    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *