• Is There GMO Sugar In Salt?

    By -

    Most plants produce substances that are toxic to humans. Most of the plants that humans consume produce toxins at levels low enough that they do not produce any adverse health effects. There is concern that inserting an exotic gene into a plant could cause it to produce toxins at higher levels that could be dangerous to humans. This could happen through the process of inserting the gene into the plant. If other genes in the plant become damaged during the insertion process it could cause the plant to alter its production of toxins.

    By Heather Callaghan

    Great April Fools' Day prank idea: Switch up your loved ones' sugar with salt. When they spit out their coffee and comment on the saltiness you can insist that it's really sugar and that there's nothing wrong, giving the prank a twisted flair.

    But you'd be right – because there's friggin' GMO sugar in salt!

    This applies to ingredients found in iodized table salt, and should concern people who are serious about allergy-inducing ingredients or who are seeking a different eating style.

    While getting a natural allergy treatment for sugar I had to avoid it completely for 25 hours. At least I can flavor food with salt, I said, but was told to check the label. Haha – okay – whatever. But no, it's true – there was sugar!

    There are a few reasons why sugar or corn-based dextrose is added to salt.

    Sally Fallon explains in Nourishing Traditions:

    Most discussions of salt ignore the issue of salt processing. Few people realize that our salt – like our sugar, flour and vegetable oils – is highly refined; it is the product of a chemical and high-temperature industrial process that removes all the valuable magnesium salts as well as trace minerals naturally occurring in the sea. To keep salt dry, salt refiners adulterate this “pure” product with several harmful additives, including aluminum compounds. To replace the natural iodine salts that are removed during processing, potassium iodide is added in amounts that can be toxic. To stabilize the volatile iodine compound, processors add dextrose which turns the iodized salt a purplish color. A bleaching agent is then necessary to restore whiteness to the salt… Even most so-called sea salt is produced by industrial methods. [emphasis added]


    Many sources confirm that sugar or dextrose is added at 0.04 percent or 40 milligrams per 100 grams of salt to stabilize the potassium iodide, but are the anti-caking agents and added sugars worth the hassle of added iodine in salt? You decide. But to the person who can go into anaphylaxis from corn ingredients or those trying to avoid sugars and GMOs – it is not worth it.

    There are three other, perhaps unwitting, reasons why this added dextrose benefits Big Food when it comes to salt. 1) it covers up the icky flavor of iodine. 2) It makes the salt taste even saltier to our taste buds. 3) It's a cheap filler – yes, sugar is cheaper than salt – we can thank subsidies for that. So, if you wanted to run to salt while you eliminate other ingredients, iodized salt is not the way to go.

    When looking for salt please don't be fooled by companies who are trying to look natural or claim to come from the sea. Nutritious unprocessed salt with naturally occurring trace minerals is not white! It doesn't have added ingredients. It will be a different hue entirely, preferably pink or grey, and possibly brown or really off-white. If you want good iodine, add kelp while boiling dry beans – the beans will soak it up for you. Add kelp to soups as a way to “doctor” up your foods.

    Salt isn't bad at all. Either get naturally occurring or non-iodized table salt (I know, horribly processed) but don't stop eating it. A milestone JAMA study showed that people who don't consume salt die younger from heart problems – and do you really think they used pink Himalayan natural salt for that study? Store it. Use a pinch in water to prevent heat stroke and dehydration.

    Many scientists, doctors and health advocates raise concerns about the unintended impact of GMOs on human health. Yes, because there is no independent research (and in fact, seed companies’ agreements forbid the use of seeds for independent research), nobody can say with any degree of certainty that GMOs are safe.  And so it is not surprising that there are unresolved questions concerning the potential alteration in human genome, allergenicity of introduced genes and high toxin production in plants and animals that may lead to long-term health effects.


    Staff Writer

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *