• 105 Scientists Criticize Retraction of GMO-Rat-Study

    By -

    Recently, a published, peer-reviewed  paper exposing the dangers of Roundup herbicide and Roundup-tolerant crops was retracted. Some brave voices in the scientific community have stepped forward to condemn the retraction. It seems the paper was not wrong at all, but became the target of an attempt at censorship on a corporate level.

    What kind of hornet’s nest was opened up for the GM industry in view of the retraction of the two year “Long term toxicity of a Roundup herbicide and a Roundup-tolerant genetically modified maize”, by G E Séralini et al, published in Food and Chemical Toxicology 2012, 50(11), 4221-31?

    According to the article published December 5, 2013 in the Ecologist,
    This arbitrary, groundless retraction of a published, thoroughly peer-reviewed paper is without precedent in the history of scientific publishing, and raises grave concerns over the integrity and impartiality of science. These concerns are heightened by a sequence of events surrounding the retraction:

    • the appointment of ex-Monsanto employee Richard Goodman to the newly created post of associate editor for biotechnology at FCT
    • the retraction of another study finding potentially harmful effects from GMOs (which almost immediately appeared in another journal)
    • the failure …


    Catherine J Frompovich (website) is a retired natural nutritionist who earned advanced degrees in Nutrition and Holistic Health Sciences, Certification in Orthomolecular Theory and Practice plus Paralegal Studies. Her work has been published in national and airline magazines since the early 1980s. Catherine authored numerous books on health issues along with co-authoring papers and monographs with physicians, nurses, and holistic healthcare professionals. She has been a consumer healthcare researcher 35 years and counting.



    Staff Writer

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *